Why lock? Because it's a kind of a report and must be taken seriously, some people are just mocking because Bess made this topic, if it was an ''oldies'' as some call them selfs then it'd have been considered. Seriously just let the staff take in charge stuff like that.
Pl: if you can provide me by pm a definition of good drama or a trusted source that explains it, I'd appreciate it.
Did you even read his topic? Did you even understand his message? He isn't reporting anything since this wasn't posted in the report section nor in the suggestions/feedback section.
He basically posted this topic in the Ambrosian discussions board. If his intentions made sense and his message was well formulated, then I would have kept it in that board since I would have been pretty sure that his post would have not created any drama. However, most of his sentences are provocations and in order to give some strength to his message, he took the decision to use tons of inappropriate words just to show a bit of dominance and that's why I took the decision to move it directly to the Drama Corner since I know, by experience, that this kind of topics end up causing drama and are locked when the drama reaches a certain point. And trust me, as long as I'm/we are here, this kind of posts will be directly moved to this corner whether its poster agrees or not. And
@Rawrplus, this may seem a bit harsh but at least, if the posters get ridiculed by dank memes or whatsoever, they will make an effort the next time they express themselves in this forum and will avoid creating unnecessary drama topics like this one in the future so it's somehow a better system than warnings and mutes (even if it has its negative side effects).
So let's keep going on. He also brought some past issues that happened ages ago in order to prove a point that doesn't make sense anymore (seriously, are we really being unfair?) but if you really want me to let you know what happened then I'll explain if that's really what you want. So, this guy that you are defending so hard basically made a suggestion in the JB corner to give FDs after a prisoner wins a LR (WHICH WAS ALREADY WRITTEN IN THE RULES). But the thing is that he made this suggestion only because he was given a FD during a general FD (because of Jake, but I'll explain later) and he wanted an other FD the round after. Basically, he won LR the round before Jake joined the server. When Jake joined the server, he went directly to the CT team since I was alone and he started a FD for all (yeah, when someone goes to the CT team, it's always a FD for all apparently) so his personal FD was somehow unnecessary since everyone had a FD. However, I still gave him a personal FD and gave him the opportunity to keep it after 4:00, but despite of this, he took the decision to go to the gunroom and to get himself killed AND in addition to that, he wanted a FD the round after for NO REASON, only because he wanted to be the special snowflake in the server for 1 round but since everyone had a FD, his wish wasn't granted and therefore, he was butthurt and took the decision to start drama in the JB suggestions topic. But I didn't remove his freedom of speech of course. I gave him the permission to discuss about it in the JB suggestions topic, but the discussion led to a point in which it didn't make sense anymore to keep arguing about something that didn't make sense since the start. So I just told him to stop arguing and to wait for Popay but he kept arguing (butthurts are stubborn) and that's why I deleted the replies that he made after my "don't post and wait for Popay" post.
However, this happened in .eu like in NOVEMBER? So seriously, do you really believe that his topic makes sense only because he brought a past issue that wasn't even caused by my side but by himself, only because he took the decision to start drama about something that isn't that much important after all and that wasn't even caused by my side?
Instead of defending him without even understanding his message nor his intentions, how about you just skip this message and show your uselessness somewhere else?
The thing is that he still doesn't understand what's happening around here. In .eu we used to be more strict because as
@'PL' said, the Head Forum Moderator (HFM) was strict and imposed us somehow his mentality (not consciously of course but well). However, now the HFM left and we are technically the ones who are responsible for our actions since no other staff member has the "right" to moderate the whole forum a part from us and management in case you didn't know (some have the power but not the right), so instead of keeping the same mentality than in .eu,
@Eros wants us to be more lenient so we don't take all the hate by people like you who don't simply understand what's going on and take the decision to defend people without even understanding what they are saying.
Topic: About what's happening recently... (Read 519 times)