November 09, 2026, 08:32:00 am

Author Topic: [JB]Rawr's re-edition of rules (suggestion)  (Read 1066 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Rawrplus

Re: Rawr's re-edition of rules (suggestion)
« Reply #20 on: August 20, 2013, 10:52:15 am »
Rawr, you should add for terrorists that if a CT goes inside the cage and prisoners are also in there, regardless of what command is made for them, if they see a CT in the cage, they are allowed to kill him without any consequences, but they cannot leave the cage if the CT leaves it.
Prisoners shouldn't be killed for trying to get a CT who goes inside the cage and goes back out right away.

Also guys, taunting rule as Rawr explained shouldn't be added as I said, it is mostly made as an excuse to rebel when ever prisoners see fit. Also in some occasions CT must pass the prisoners in close range for them, with taunting rule it won't be possible at all.

Vent rule, the trickiest rule whatsoever in the whole JB. If a vent time is given - 30 seconds, then OFficers can check the vent that one time no matter if a new prisoner has gone inside the vent, he can still be killed.
Every time an officer wants to check the vent, they must give the warning first. This shouldn't be done of course 100 times per round, but only when CT suspects a prisoner to be in the vent. Rawr if you could modify this in a rule, would be appreciated.

Added cage rule, edited vent rule.

Thanks for suggestion :)


[ 15% ] Finally update Billing Section once and for all
[ 50% ] Ambrosia Garry's Mod Re-Invented
[ 10% ] My web-coding online series
[ 20% ] Brand new forums
[ 30% ] Ambrosia FAQ
[ 10% ] Ambrosia TV
      
           
              [ ► ] Ambrosia History (2009-2014)
              [ ► ] Ambrosia Official Twitter
              [ ► ] Ambrosia Steam Group
              [ ► ] Ambrosia Facebook
              [ ► ] Support Section
              [ ► ] Site RSS
       
             
               [ ► ] Contact me through Steam
               [ ► ] Portfolio (Unfinished)
               [ ► ] Ambrosia Teamspeak
               [ ► ] Send me a PM






[info]I am currently inactive, please contact other highstaff if you need anything[/info]

Offline PaNiCღ

Re: Rawr's re-edition of rules (suggestion)
« Reply #21 on: August 20, 2013, 10:58:32 am »
Gd job rawri i like it.

Offline 'PL'

Re: Rawr's re-edition of rules (suggestion)
« Reply #22 on: August 20, 2013, 11:20:10 am »
Do not add any taunting rules, for 2 years ambrosia were changing the jailbreak constitution. I dislike monthly changes of rules because some certain individuals can't handle server adaptation. It took me time too to understand why quickgaming, aog and sm had different rules and perspectives but at last I got over it. I suggest you guys do the same

Offline Ultor

Re: Rawr's re-edition of rules (suggestion)
« Reply #23 on: August 20, 2013, 02:55:00 pm »
By the taunting rule, meant the rule in which u call now the cage rule. I have read ur post very carefully, and I suggested edition to the sd rule if u read mine carefully :D

Offline Rawrplus

Re: Rawr's re-edition of rules (suggestion)
« Reply #24 on: August 20, 2013, 03:10:49 pm »
By the taunting rule, meant the rule in which u call now the cage rule. I have read ur post very carefully, and I suggested edition to the sd rule if u read mine carefully :D

In my eyes a special day or two at the end of a map is enough.


[ 15% ] Finally update Billing Section once and for all
[ 50% ] Ambrosia Garry's Mod Re-Invented
[ 10% ] My web-coding online series
[ 20% ] Brand new forums
[ 30% ] Ambrosia FAQ
[ 10% ] Ambrosia TV
      
           
              [ ► ] Ambrosia History (2009-2014)
              [ ► ] Ambrosia Official Twitter
              [ ► ] Ambrosia Steam Group
              [ ► ] Ambrosia Facebook
              [ ► ] Support Section
              [ ► ] Site RSS
       
             
               [ ► ] Contact me through Steam
               [ ► ] Portfolio (Unfinished)
               [ ► ] Ambrosia Teamspeak
               [ ► ] Send me a PM






[info]I am currently inactive, please contact other highstaff if you need anything[/info]

Offline MonsteR

Re: Rawr's re-edition of rules (suggestion)
« Reply #25 on: August 20, 2013, 03:54:51 pm »
I like this rules rawr. But i want just few small changes to be done but i will talk with Ray about them and then invite Rawr to a steam chat as it is better to discuss it on steam then make 100 posts.

Ty m8.



Regards,
Monster

Offline Heyo

Re: Rawr's re-edition of rules (suggestion)
« Reply #26 on: August 20, 2013, 04:18:20 pm »
Why don't you have an admin meeting which also includes older players (ex admins and old members)? Maybe they could help if they wanted to... They could give their views and suggest things

Offline P o p a y

Re: Rawr's re-edition of rules (suggestion)
« Reply #27 on: August 20, 2013, 04:51:23 pm »
Why don't you have an admin meeting which also includes older players (ex admins and old members)? Maybe they could help if they wanted to... They could give their views and suggest things

+1. Good point. Call a Meeting with Valuable members only who can really help not to chit chat. :)

Offline RoCk^^

Re: Rawr's re-edition of rules (suggestion)
« Reply #28 on: August 20, 2013, 04:56:10 pm »
I like this rules rawr. But i want just few small changes to be done but i will talk with Ray about them and then invite Rawr to a steam chat as it is better to discuss it on steam then make 100 posts.

Ty m8.



Regards,
Monster
^^ when you change small things in rules can u pls add them as normal post so we dont need to read all 30 rules again to check the small changes but if there is no admin and an officer was in knife range and the prisoners slashed him he will kill them without any warning shots
because there are many players who wont read this post and new rules and keep playing on the old rules
Thanks
RoCk^^ The jail breaker
PS : not faking jlz clan   :D

Offline Critical

  • Trust is hard to gain but easy to lose :)
  • Veteran
  • ***
  • Posts: 1499
  • Total likes: 45
  • Hi there. im from Mars.
Re: Rawr's re-edition of rules (suggestion)
« Reply #29 on: August 20, 2013, 04:56:41 pm »
Why don't you have an admin meeting which also includes older players (ex admins and old members)? Maybe they could help if they wanted to... They could give their views and suggest things

+1. Good point. Call a Meeting with Valuable members only who can really help not to chit chat. :)
Would be good  8)


Offline Red Wolf

Re: Rawr's re-edition of rules (suggestion)
« Reply #30 on: August 20, 2013, 08:36:55 pm »

(Image removed from quote.)
1. There should always be a balance of 1:3 or 1:4 CT:T
Red Wolf: So if theres no balance and admin on. Admin should be reported?
2. 30.[/color] If officer goes inside a cage during cageday, terrorists are allowed to kill him without consequences, prisoners however can't leave the cage under any circumstances.
Red Wolf: If theres a command leave backwall u die, the officers outside the cage can kill the T who left backwall?
« Last Edit: August 20, 2013, 08:43:57 pm by Red Wolf »
Life can only be understood backwards but it must be lived forwards. -Soren Kierkegaard




Offline Ed

Re: Rawr's re-edition of rules (suggestion)
« Reply #31 on: August 20, 2013, 08:40:18 pm »
Why don't you have an admin meeting which also includes older players (ex admins and old members)? Maybe they could help if they wanted to... They could give their views and suggest things

+1. Good point. Call a Meeting with Valuable members only who can really help not to chit chat. :)

^ This. I agree with this highly.
[div class="cat_bar"][div class="catbg" style="font-size: 18px;font-family: Oswald;line-height: 52px;text-shadow: -1px -1px rgba(0, 0, 0, 0.43);    background: #2b2b2b;background: -moz-linear-gradient(top, #2b2b2b 0%, #191919 100%);background: -webkit-linear-gradient(top, #2b2b2b 0%,#191919 100%);background: linear-gradient(to bottom, #2b2b2b 0%,#191919 100%);box-shadow: 0 2px 0 rgba(255,255,255,0.1) inset;text-align:left;font-weight: 700;"][div class="pt_bar"][div class="ptbg"][span class="pt"][email protected][/span][/div][/div]

Offline ~RoN

Re: Rawr's re-edition of rules (suggestion)
« Reply #32 on: August 20, 2013, 08:48:55 pm »
Why don't you have an admin meeting which also includes older players (ex admins and old members)? Maybe they could help if they wanted to... They could give their views and suggest things

+1. Good point. Call a Meeting with Valuable members only who can really help not to chit chat. :)

^ This. I agree with this highly.
that would be great i agree.
Once you cross over, there are things
in the darkness that can keep your heart
from ever feeling the light again.

Offline NexT

Re: Rawr's re-edition of rules (suggestion)
« Reply #33 on: August 20, 2013, 08:56:48 pm »
get these rules in a red color because almost everyone brakes them. Rule 15. Rule 17.

add rule which is once an admin asks for CT do not spam with me .. spamming with "me" won't let him pick you faster

and why not add a rule which says not allowed to make more than 2 special days in a map .. sometimes they do like 4 or 5 just .. once there is 10 minutes left do special day only 2 and if the 2 special days are done map didn't change either you change it either put back the old cts and play normal

Loves,
NexT

Offline onyzz;;

Re: Rawr's re-edition of rules (suggestion)
« Reply #34 on: August 20, 2013, 09:02:04 pm »

(Image removed from quote.)
1. There should always be a balance of 1:3 or 1:4 CT:T
Red Wolf: So if theres no balance and admin on. Admin should be reported?
2. 30.[/color] If officer goes inside a cage during cageday, terrorists are allowed to kill him without consequences, prisoners however can't leave the cage under any circumstances.
Red Wolf: If theres a command leave backwall u die, the officers outside the cage can kill the T who left backwall?

1st: hmm, no.
2nd: also no.


Finally, Here is the proof that Replica is a PEDO !

Offline Duke Devlin

Re: Rawr's re-edition of rules (suggestion)
« Reply #35 on: August 20, 2013, 09:24:45 pm »
Good job Rawr, this is what I would expect when I view a topic with jailbreak rules


Offline MonsteR

Re: Rawr's re-edition of rules (suggestion)
« Reply #36 on: August 21, 2013, 10:09:36 am »
The problem is that if we make a meeting we will waste too much time for talking nearly nothing. Because all which what something to be changed in the rules are allowed to post their suggestions here. If you think that something in the rules should be changed just post it here. Then all suggesting stuff and making 3 hours.




Regards,
Monster

Offline Ed

Re: Rawr's re-edition of rules (suggestion)
« Reply #37 on: August 21, 2013, 10:13:41 am »
Monster, it's your job to make the meeting and pin point discussion topics for everyone in the meeting. Right now you want to change something in what Rawrplus made, no one knows what, because you never posted what, therefore, this leaving us with question mark whether that will be right to do so.

Also there are many subjects to talk about.
[div class="cat_bar"][div class="catbg" style="font-size: 18px;font-family: Oswald;line-height: 52px;text-shadow: -1px -1px rgba(0, 0, 0, 0.43);    background: #2b2b2b;background: -moz-linear-gradient(top, #2b2b2b 0%, #191919 100%);background: -webkit-linear-gradient(top, #2b2b2b 0%,#191919 100%);background: linear-gradient(to bottom, #2b2b2b 0%,#191919 100%);box-shadow: 0 2px 0 rgba(255,255,255,0.1) inset;text-align:left;font-weight: 700;"][div class="pt_bar"][div class="ptbg"][span class="pt"][email protected][/span][/div][/div]

Offline MonsteR

Re: Rawr's re-edition of rules (suggestion)
« Reply #38 on: August 21, 2013, 10:39:34 am »
What i wanted to do is make the edits and then post it here so you can see them and say if you like them or not.

Offline Rawrplus

Re: Rawr's re-edition of rules (suggestion)
« Reply #39 on: August 21, 2013, 02:34:42 pm »
What i wanted to do is make the edits and then post it here so you can see them and say if you like them or not.

I'd recommend a meeting, so you can hear out opinions of certain long-time mebers on specific rules  ::)


[ 15% ] Finally update Billing Section once and for all
[ 50% ] Ambrosia Garry's Mod Re-Invented
[ 10% ] My web-coding online series
[ 20% ] Brand new forums
[ 30% ] Ambrosia FAQ
[ 10% ] Ambrosia TV
      
           
              [ ► ] Ambrosia History (2009-2014)
              [ ► ] Ambrosia Official Twitter
              [ ► ] Ambrosia Steam Group
              [ ► ] Ambrosia Facebook
              [ ► ] Support Section
              [ ► ] Site RSS
       
             
               [ ► ] Contact me through Steam
               [ ► ] Portfolio (Unfinished)
               [ ► ] Ambrosia Teamspeak
               [ ► ] Send me a PM






[info]I am currently inactive, please contact other highstaff if you need anything[/info]