November 08, 2026, 07:45:38 pm

Author Topic: amx_destroy and amx_clean  (Read 178 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline [C]asperTheOG

amx_destroy and amx_clean
« on: December 12, 2016, 01:51:27 pm »
could u please add amx_destory for the lifeless banevaders which will make them get bored from deleting cfg..
and amx_clean

Offline lith!um.wow

Re: amx_destroy and amx_clean
« Reply #1 on: December 12, 2016, 01:58:15 pm »
Already been suggested & they're working on something like this.
Its just the Management Team kinda busy these days ;)
« Last Edit: December 12, 2016, 02:48:24 pm by lith!um.wow »

Re: amx_destroy and amx_clean
« Reply #2 on: December 12, 2016, 02:44:27 pm »
could u please add amx_destory for the lifeless banevaders which will make them get bored from deleting cfg..
and amx_clean
amx_destroy was rejected by management.
We had a very long talk with management about how to deal with ban-evaders in the last couple of weeks; we came up with temporary ways to deal with them, with the hope of finding a permanent solution as soon as possible. If you've been active since few weeks and till now, you'll notice that the number of hackers and ban-evaders on server reduced substantially.
 

Offline Fadi Al-Johari

Re: amx_destroy and amx_clean
« Reply #3 on: December 12, 2016, 02:46:35 pm »
Huge support for amx_destroy... If you check the ban list, you will see that i banned someone like 6-7 times, and he keeps ban evading + using cheats (Aimbot + speedhack), I stopped banning him and started slaying and kicking him, I think that i've kicked him more than 50 times, for now he is gone... i hope he never comes back.
amx_destroy is needed for such people like him.. with strict rules about when to use that command, and on who, I think there won't be any abusing on that command :)

Offline Fisu

  • The only time success comes before work is in the dictionary.
  • Unstoppable
  • *****
  • Posts: 6973
  • Total likes: 616
  • :)
Re: amx_destroy and amx_clean
« Reply #4 on: December 12, 2016, 02:58:26 pm »
Dealing with those banevaders is easy.

Don't ban them. SLAY them ;)


Offline D3Y!!S

  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 83
  • Total likes: 41
  • Better a diamond with a flaw than a pebble without
Re: amx_destroy and amx_clean
« Reply #5 on: December 12, 2016, 03:00:57 pm »
support for amx_destroy  and PC destroy  :D

Offline silex™

  • Think, it ain't illegal yet, but they're working on it
  • Legend
  • ****
  • Posts: 2348
  • Total likes: 489
  • If you stand for nothing, You'll fall for anything
Re: amx_destroy and amx_clean
« Reply #6 on: December 12, 2016, 03:05:47 pm »
I don't think its a good idea since there are new admins with 0 experience, they could ruin a good player's cs.

Offline Fisu

  • The only time success comes before work is in the dictionary.
  • Unstoppable
  • *****
  • Posts: 6973
  • Total likes: 616
  • :)
Re: amx_destroy and amx_clean
« Reply #7 on: December 12, 2016, 03:07:22 pm »
I don't think its a good idea since there are new admins with 0 experience, they could ruin a good player's cs.

Silex using it on a normal cheater no.

using it on a banevader yes. that's what I would add as a rule

Offline Fadi Al-Johari

Re: amx_destroy and amx_clean
« Reply #8 on: December 12, 2016, 03:18:33 pm »
I slayed that guy a lot, I even kicked him a lot, and he keeps coming...
with 1 command (amx_destroy) he wont ever come back lol... also the only use for amx_destroy should be only on banevaders.

Re: amx_destroy and amx_clean
« Reply #9 on: December 12, 2016, 03:40:31 pm »
I slayed that guy a lot, I even kicked him a lot, and he keeps coming...
with 1 command (amx_destroy) he wont ever come back lol... also the only use for amx_destroy should be only on banevaders.
after you kick him, get his IP using amx_last and ban it using amx_addban "IP" "0" "banevader", it will take him about 5 minutes to come back.
 

Offline [C]asperTheOG

Re: amx_destroy and amx_clean
« Reply #10 on: December 12, 2016, 04:00:54 pm »
amx_destroy was rejected by management.
We had a very long talk with management about how to deal with ban-evaders in the last couple of weeks; we came up with temporary ways to deal with them, with the hope of finding a permanent solution as soon as possible. If you've been active since few weeks and till now, you'll notice that the number of hackers and ban-evaders on server reduced substantially.
bro check the ban list this Algerian lifeless kid was changing his ip every 10 secs and joining with bots or his friends idk.
Dealing with those banevaders is easy.

Don't ban them. SLAY them ;)


there is no amx_autoslay

Offline [C]asperTheOG

Re: amx_destroy and amx_clean
« Reply #11 on: December 12, 2016, 04:01:41 pm »
Whats wrong of using it on a banevader?
#Banevader_Rights ?? ?? 
« Last Edit: December 12, 2016, 04:10:25 pm by [C]asper »

Re: amx_destroy and amx_clean
« Reply #12 on: December 12, 2016, 04:12:33 pm »
bro check the ban list this Algerian lifeless kid was changing his ip every 10 secs and joining with bots or his friends idk.
I've made a special topic under "Administration" about that Algerian hacker. As I said, there is no permanent way to deal with him at the moment, but we've come up with temporary solutions to hinder his activity and it's working (you'll get to know it if u got accepted for admin). Some admins are not following these solutions allowing him to come back within second; whereas if they did follow, he won't be able to come back for at least 4-5 minutes.
 

Offline [C]asperTheOG

Re: amx_destroy and amx_clean
« Reply #13 on: December 12, 2016, 04:16:06 pm »
I've made a special topic under "Administration" about that Algerian hacker. As I said, there is no permanent way to deal with him at the moment, but we've come up with temporary solutions to hinder his activity and it's working (you'll get to know it if u got accepted for admin). Some admins are not following these solutions allowing him to come back within second; whereas if they did follow, he won't be able to come back for at least 4-5 minutes.
okay but whats wrong of using it on ban-evaders, not cheaters

Offline SychO

Re: amx_destroy and amx_clean
« Reply #14 on: December 12, 2016, 04:18:15 pm »
okay but whats wrong of using it on ban-evaders, not cheaters

Cuz it's useless, it's not as efficient as you may think.

Re: amx_destroy and amx_clean
« Reply #15 on: December 12, 2016, 04:22:37 pm »
okay but whats wrong of using it on ban-evaders, not cheaters
you'll need to ask the management for that  :D but apparently it caused alot of headache when it was allowed long time ago.
 

Offline [C]asperTheOG

Re: amx_destroy and amx_clean
« Reply #16 on: December 12, 2016, 04:25:11 pm »
Cuz it's useless, it's not as efficient as you may think.
"Ruin CS client  , Major Lag , No Config File , he will automaticaly disconnect after some seconds , Con_Color will be black
No Crosshair , You can NOT access the GameMenu Basicly The client will have to re-install CS in order to fix this"
"useless"

Offline SychO

Re: amx_destroy and amx_clean
« Reply #17 on: December 12, 2016, 04:28:56 pm »
"Ruin CS client  , Major Lag , No Config File , he will automaticaly disconnect after some seconds , Con_Color will be black
No Crosshair , You can NOT access the GameMenu Basicly The client will have to re-install CS in order to fix this"
"useless"

Trust me they comeback in not much time :D

Offline Red Wolf

Re: amx_destroy and amx_clean
« Reply #18 on: December 12, 2016, 04:29:32 pm »
"Ruin CS client  , Major Lag , No Config File , he will automaticaly disconnect after some seconds , Con_Color will be black
No Crosshair , You can NOT access the GameMenu Basicly The client will have to re-install CS in order to fix this"
"useless"
He will have to replace config only. Probably another file in resources.
Thia takes less than 2 mins. After he finds a way around (its easy, just 2 clicks away) he wont even have to replace config.
Life can only be understood backwards but it must be lived forwards. -Soren Kierkegaard




Offline [C]asperTheOG

Re: amx_destroy and amx_clean
« Reply #19 on: December 12, 2016, 04:31:12 pm »
Trust me they comeback in not much time :D
how long?

 coz this guy took 10 secs to