Branching out to CS:GO!

[Fisu]

I don't think "RANK" should be voted here. I'm more with the ammout of wins. With over 100 Wins at cs go, you're able to detect if somone is hacking or not. Not with rank..

[groentje]

My rank is DMG, if i was active, i might have applied for an application but i'm not active. That's why...

[Lagger]

Silver Elite Master and have 28 MM wins, carry most of the time my team. Please don't say I'm bot

[NexT]

Thanks to everyone that worked on it

Loves,
NexT

[Fisu]

Silver Elite Master and have 28 MM wins, carry most of the time my team. Please don't say I'm bot

Not enough brah

[tajski]

I don't think "RANK" should be voted here. I'm more with the ammout of wins. With over 100 Wins at cs go, you're able to detect if somone is hacking or not. Not with rank..

Are you actually serious, haha! 100 wins? I've seen Silvers with 200 wins and well, they're still silver..

Still holding onto what groentje said, rank like Master Guardian 2 and/or Master Guardian Elite should be the minimum. The only problem that I can spot straight away is people boosting others to that specific rank. There must be some kind of a test to be made for accepted admins as I think that trial admins is not gonna be enough to see whether they're capable or not. Anyway, that's all up to High Staff. It's their call!

[Fisu]

Well Mister

I can ask my friends to play all the time with them and they'll bring me till mg2 and as soon as I play alone id fail, I play with Mg2 all time while beeing on nova and they aint better at all.

200 wins is enoug gameplay to catch  hackers. Somone whos silver 1 with 200 Wins can much easier detect a hacker than somone whos mg1 with 30 wins. Skills in game dont give you skills about catching hackers.

^^

[Ed]

I won't be playing DM when it has 15+ people! It gets highly frustrating when you shoot someone and before you manage to kill him/her, you get shot from behind, side or whatever. Gets really frustrating lol!

I vote for normal CS GO DD2 Server At least then there is some sort of a balance!

[almighty DomiNic]

I won't be playing DM when it has 15+ people! It gets highly frustrating when you shoot someone and before you manage to kill him/her, you get shot from behind, side or whatever. Gets really frustrating lol!

I vote for normal CS GO DD2 Server At least then there is some sort of a balance!

Then it won't be full like DM is at the moment.

[Ed]

Well that's the only worry, but in time I think this might be possible.

[Rubix]

Public servers such as DD2 only do tend to get very full, but it won't be as simple as DM since there is not as big of a player-base which do not mind waiting to respawn rather than instantly.

[Fisu]

Public servers such as DD2 only do tend to get very full, but it won't be as simple as DM since there is not as big of a player-base which do not mind waiting to respawn rather than instantly.

I do like the friendly fire, but it gets annoying, if you spawn at the platfrom "B" You have 1 behind you, 1 tunnel and one outside waiting for the spawn time to get away HEH.

[RAMBATEN]

I dont like the idea choosing admin by their ranks. It's not justified and fair to everyone. Even some lems in this game are clueless. But dm is very hard for detecting hackers, because when you play it more you know where to expect enemies comin.

Overall what mathers is time played in csgo..Not offend of you have high amount hours in cs 1.6..csgo way different.

Ps. Sam shoot headshots.  and Hate my lg g2 autotext.

['PL']

And that's why I hate csgo.


There is a richid ranking system which prejudices people, Many games who have this are basically rpg.

[Rawrplus]

Personally I think it's inapropriate to judge after one's rank, I think a rank is a good paramater to keep an eye on and I feel like high-rank players should be given somewhat of a priority based on the fact, they know a bit more about the game - and I know people can say, "that no high-ranks are  not good, I'm as good as them but I just am not a nerd that nolifes nonstop", but as somebody who plays league and achieved relatively high rank (diamond EUNE and plat EUW), I can tell you that's a sorry-ass excuse. Rank does matter and while your game knowledge may be on relatively the same level, it's the small details that make high-ranked players high-ranked for a reason.

On the other hand, I don't think you should write people off simply because they have not reached a high-rank. I feel like a good admin is determined not only by his in-game skill, but also his interaction with players, maturity level, management and so on.

Let me tell you a good example - Raven never really was the most elite CS 1.6 player out there and although right now he's somewhat inactive as he's busy with his real life (although he will be coming back soon!) but I'd still take him over any high-skill cs 1.6 mixers, if the mixer is a jerk, I think a humble guy with will to improve and be fair with everybody would make much better admin than the high-skill player who'd however make a mockery out of the server.

I do think the rank of the player should be one of the factors when determining admin - but it should not be something to decide whether one will be admin or not - for the sake of a high-quality admin team - and unless a miracle happens and I'm somehow convinced otherwise, I refuse to let purely rank decide the application of our CS:GO applicants.

[Pim]

Personally I think it's inapropriate to judge after one's rank, I think a rank is a good paramater to keep an eye on and I feel like high-rank players should be given somewhat of a priority based on the fact, they know a bit more about the game - and I know people can say, "that no high-ranks are  not good, I'm as good as them but I just am not a nerd that nolifes nonstop", but as somebody who plays league and achieved relatively high rank (diamond EUNE and plat EUW), I can tell you that's a sorry-ass excuse. Rank does matter and while your game knowledge may be on relatively the same level, it's the small details that make high-ranked players high-ranked for a reason.

On the other hand, I don't think you should write people off simply because they have not reached a high-rank. I feel like a good admin is determined not only by his in-game skill, but also his interaction with players, maturity level, management and so on.

Let me tell you a good example - Raven never really was the most elite CS 1.6 player out there and although right now he's somewhat inactive as he's busy with his real life (although he will be coming back soon!) but I'd still take him over any high-skill cs 1.6 mixers, if the mixer is a jerk, I think a humble guy with will to improve and be fair with everybody would make much better admin than the high-skill player who'd however make a mockery out of the server.

I do think the rank of the player should be one of the factors when determining admin - but it should not be something to decide whether one will be admin or not - for the sake of a high-quality admin team - and unless a miracle happens and I'm somehow convinced otherwise, I refuse to let purely rank decide the application of our CS:GO applicants.

I couldn't agree more.

Well said samuel

[Ray]

Personally I think it's inapropriate to judge after one's rank, I think a rank is a good paramater to keep an eye on and I feel like high-rank players should be given somewhat of a priority based on the fact, they know a bit more about the game - and I know people can say, "that no high-ranks are  not good, I'm as good as them but I just am not a nerd that nolifes nonstop", but as somebody who plays league and achieved relatively high rank (diamond EUNE and plat EUW), I can tell you that's a sorry-ass excuse. Rank does matter and while your game knowledge may be on relatively the same level, it's the small details that make high-ranked players high-ranked for a reason.

On the other hand, I don't think you should write people off simply because they have not reached a high-rank. I feel like a good admin is determined not only by his in-game skill, but also his interaction with players, maturity level, management and so on.

Let me tell you a good example - Raven never really was the most elite CS 1.6 player out there and although right now he's somewhat inactive as he's busy with his real life (although he will be coming back soon!) but I'd still take him over any high-skill cs 1.6 mixers, if the mixer is a jerk, I think a humble guy with will to improve and be fair with everybody would make much better admin than the high-skill player who'd however make a mockery out of the server.

I do think the rank of the player should be one of the factors when determining admin - but it should not be something to decide whether one will be admin or not - for the sake of a high-quality admin team - and unless a miracle happens and I'm somehow convinced otherwise, I refuse to let purely rank decide the application of our CS:GO applicants.

Another weird fact:
Why's Rawr not here yet ?
Well said.

['PL']

oh boy the hall of fame.

Gotta wait to see what's the flavor text for cardy

[tajski]

I do agree with you Rawrplus although you don't know what's happening in MM of CS:GO. Those that are of a smaller rank tend to get really frustrated and call any good player a cheater. That's why I believe that a rank does matter to a certain extent. I'm not saying that if the applicant is Gold Nova (Silver in LoL) he should immediately be denied. There is a trial admin rank for a reason although right now is not the time. I'm not being big-headed because of my rank but if we allow Silver/Gold (Bronze/Silver: LoL) to take over at this moment and time we will see no "good" players as those will either be banned or frustrated because one of the friends just got banned.

What I'm trying to say, sure we can admins of any rank just like we did in 1.6 but not now, where administration skills are crucial. Once the servers get rolling and we get a stable amount of players we can then start thinking about accepting those less experienced and let them grow as an administrator. Same goes for modded servers. You don't need a Global Elite (Challenger: LoL) to lead a JB server or any other modded servers that Ambrosia is going to release in the near future.

Ambrosia was never like that, we never accepted admins because of their in-game skills. Yes, you're right. Other properties do count as well. I don't want to change any rules but we kinda have to if we want to keep those good players on the server rather than on the banlist.

[Rawrplus]

I do agree with you Rawrplus although you don't know what's happening in MM of CS:GO. Those that are of a smaller rank tend to get really frustrated and call any good player a cheater. That's why I believe that a rank does matter to a certain extent. I'm not saying that if the applicant is Gold Nova (Silver in LoL) he should immediately be denied. There is a trial admin rank for a reason although right now is not the time. I'm not being big-headed because of my rank but if we allow Silver/Gold (Bronze/Silver: LoL) to take over at this moment and time we will see no "good" players as those will either be banned or frustrated because one of the friends just got banned.

What I'm trying to say, sure we can admins of any rank just like we did in 1.6 but not now, where administration skills are crucial. Once the servers get rolling and we get a stable amount of players we can then start thinking about accepting those less experienced and let them grow as an administrator. Same goes for modded servers. You don't need a Global Elite (Challenger: LoL) to lead a JB server or any other modded servers that Ambrosia is going to release in the near future.

Ambrosia was never like that, we never accepted admins because of their in-game skills. Yes, you're right. Other properties do count as well. I don't want to change any rules but we kinda have to if we want to keep those good players on the server rather than on the banlist.

I never said ranks don't matter, I think you undermine my point there. I think it's important to have advanced understanding of game and I think the rank should be one of the factors when determining an admin, just not the one and only deciding one.