Ok, so here's my opinion, but firstly I need you to read these definitions :
a·buse (-byz)
tr.v. a·bused, a·bus·ing, a·bus·es
1. To use wrongly or improperly; misuse: abuse alcohol; abuse a privilege.
2. To hurt or injure by maltreatment; ill-use.
3. To force sexual activity on; rape or molest.
4. To assail with contemptuous, coarse, or insulting words; revile.
5. Obsolete To deceive or trick.
n. (-bys)
1. Improper use or handling; misuse: abuse of authority; drug abuse.
2. Physical maltreatment: spousal abuse.
3. Sexual abuse.
4. An unjust or wrongful practice: a government that commits abuses against its citizens.
5. Insulting or coarse language: verbal abuse.
abuse of power
The act of using one’s position of power in an abusive way. This can take many forms, such as taking advantage of someone, gaining access to information that shouldn’t be accessible to the public, or just manipulating someone with the ability to punish them if they don’t comply.
Does your definition of abuse match with one of these above? Surely not.
You say at a first time that Jake was commiting an abusive act but then you say that his act was commited "without reason" which means that you are not even coherent with your own ideas.
Which basically means that you don't even know why you are reporting him and this could be due to personal reasons or whatever.
Now regarding your evidence. Your evidence is not useful and cannot be used in your favour because noone seems to complain against Jake not even the player who underwent the command and moreover we don't know if it was a game or a day who needed the use of this command.
So in my opinion, if you want this complaint to be taken seriously, either you provide a proof of KLRM.. complaining about Jake or a proof that shows that Jake's act
Cheers.
Topic: [DROPPED]Admin abuse (Read 317 times)