November 10, 2026, 05:59:06 am

Author Topic: [PermBan]Surf-report  (Read 112 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline SAViZi

[PermBan]Surf-report
« on: April 12, 2014, 10:40:01 pm »
Playername: SF*WuB*Za[K]!~SW4[GG]y~
Steam-ID (If Possible): STEAM_0:0:1476818199
Server: Surf
Date & Time: APRIL 12, 2014, 10:32:37 PM
Complaint: Wallhack
Other Evidence (screenshots, demos...):
http://www.mediafire.com/download/8ssxq84ngxob5e6/swaggy.dem
http://www.mediafire.com/download/n7pemtoxsnq707z/swaggy2.dem
Also James from the second demo, swearing at all who killed him. Maybe Ban for a week..
« Last Edit: April 18, 2014, 03:14:29 am by *PL* »

Offline Jay

Re: Surf-report
« Reply #1 on: April 13, 2014, 09:51:26 am »
It is frustrating that this demo is 30 seconds long. There's just not enough to convict him of anything (proof positively). The last kill in the demo is very dodgy in my opinion.

Offline SAViZi

Re: Surf-report
« Reply #2 on: April 13, 2014, 12:23:15 pm »
Sorry mate, I confused the second one link: this one is the real http://www.mediafire.com/download/n7pemtoxsnq707z/swaggy2.dem
In 1st demo when he was in jail and he killed the guy who was in Buyroom...
And in the second demo, there are a lot momonts with awp, when he go to tower under awp place, he don't check if somoene is in jail, But once he did, he saw somone through the box and killed them..
Thanks.

Offline 'PL'

Re: Surf-report
« Reply #3 on: April 16, 2014, 08:52:07 pm »
Wallhack: 50% (Developed into 100%)

Other Comments: First demo is just based on one single kill and plausible wall-scanning. However is unable to concretely underline him as a cheater, thus indicating that the demo is considered useless as evidence and by that notation discarded.
Second demo has more footage but really dodgy kills, I can only determinate that it was quite suspicious at the last round where he somehow "tracked" the ct falling down and spawning in the jail. As a surf server, radar and footsteps cannot be used coherently to justify "preaiming" or awareness so I will take it as a "blind spot", but one blind spot cannot be contemplated as a whole proof for cheating. I would also like the savi(the reporter) to pinpoint other parts of the second footage which he considers inflection points(objects of interest). To put it quite easy for you, please specifically highlight me parts which you rationally think of being "suspicious"

Player is banned
Thank you for the time and effort following the format and reporting him to us.
« Last Edit: April 18, 2014, 03:15:53 am by *PL* »

Offline SAViZi

Re: [In Review]Surf-report
« Reply #4 on: April 17, 2014, 07:20:42 pm »
I)
After viewing the first demo (swaggy), I can say that the counter-terrorist was really visible also I didn't notice any wallhack. But I ask to check to administrators of the surf server his actions via eps admin wallhack or something like that.
II)
On the 30th second of the second demo(swaggy2) it is visible that he looks at the enemy though a wall when he surfs he  wasn't visible at all (even in the slow-motion it's not  visible no one pixel of ct. On the 45th second He aimed through the floor and kill the enemy(He may saw him before..).50th second, He aimed through the box and killed the enemy in jail. 5'45, He aimed through the box and didn't kill the enemy in jail. 5'51, he aimed through the floor and didn't kill the enemy.
« Last Edit: April 17, 2014, 07:22:33 pm by savi »

Offline 'PL'

Re: [In Review]Surf-report
« Reply #5 on: April 18, 2014, 03:14:17 am »
30' - Blind Spot, Suspicion level raised
45' - Blind spot, Suspicion level further raised
50' - Explainable(the encounter at the 45' given him the information that he would appear in the jail), no increments or decrements
5'45 - Blind spot, Threshold reached
5'51 - Explainable(the rest of the surf track is leading that way, so it's not questionable that he would preaim to get ready), no increments or decrements.

From the current developments, you have proven me that he is cheating. Congratulations.

___________/
Ban Verdict.