November 08, 2026, 10:50:57 pm

Author Topic: [JB]Rawr's re-edition of rules (suggestion)  (Read 982 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Ed

Re: Rawr's re-edition of rules (suggestion)
« Reply #80 on: August 26, 2013, 12:37:57 pm »
It goes under the rule, clear microphone. I believe the rule about microphone should be updated. Clear, people can understand and good voice. Annoying ones cannot be CT. This is how you can have 2 bunnies with 1 shot. I said it before, rather they use the voice changer than we have to hear annoying small voice. Some voices are better than others, gotta admit that.

Also how will you know for sure that they are using voice changer? Me for example had a microphone and most people said it sounded like radio, again I am sure some thought im using voice changer.
[div class="cat_bar"][div class="catbg" style="font-size: 18px;font-family: Oswald;line-height: 52px;text-shadow: -1px -1px rgba(0, 0, 0, 0.43);    background: #2b2b2b;background: -moz-linear-gradient(top, #2b2b2b 0%, #191919 100%);background: -webkit-linear-gradient(top, #2b2b2b 0%,#191919 100%);background: linear-gradient(to bottom, #2b2b2b 0%,#191919 100%);box-shadow: 0 2px 0 rgba(255,255,255,0.1) inset;text-align:left;font-weight: 700;"][div class="pt_bar"][div class="ptbg"][span class="pt"][email protected][/span][/div][/div]

Offline onyzz;;

Re: Rawr's re-edition of rules (suggestion)
« Reply #81 on: August 26, 2013, 06:32:40 pm »
It goes under the rule, clear microphone. I believe the rule about microphone should be updated. Clear, people can understand and good voice. Annoying ones cannot be CT. This is how you can have 2 bunnies with 1 shot. I said it before, rather they use the voice changer than we have to hear annoying small voice. Some voices are better than others, gotta admit that.

Also how will you know for sure that they are using voice changer? Me for example had a microphone and most people said it sounded like radio, again I am sure some thought im using voice changer.

that also avoids kids to be ct, as their voice is also pretty annoying ._.


Finally, Here is the proof that Replica is a PEDO !

Offline P o p a y

Re: Rawr's re-edition of rules (suggestion)
« Reply #82 on: August 26, 2013, 06:40:02 pm »
Kids Voice annoying ? Are you kidding me?

80% of the VALUABLE persons of Ambrosia are Children who fulfill this community. You are not even active in jailbreak mate, so you don't know what's going on. It's not their fault they are 12 years old and have a gentle voice, don't forger you were 12 in the past.

Nothing negative against you but your statement will irritate a lot of players.

Regards,
Popay

Offline onyzz;;

Re: Rawr's re-edition of rules (suggestion)
« Reply #83 on: August 26, 2013, 07:24:50 pm »
Kids Voice annoying ? Are you kidding me?

80% of the VALUABLE persons of Ambrosia are Children who fulfill this community. You are not even active in jailbreak mate, so you don't know what's going on. It's not their fault they are 12 years old and have a gentle voice, don't forger you were 12 in the past.

Nothing negative against you but your statement will irritate a lot of players.

Regards,
Popay

1. i'm not actually inactive in jailbreak, as i play there everyday ._.
2. If they get irritated it's their problem, but in my opinion and maybe some other persons, they are indeed annoying.


Finally, Here is the proof that Replica is a PEDO !

Offline MonsteR

Re: Rawr's re-edition of rules (suggestion)
« Reply #84 on: August 27, 2013, 11:18:57 am »
Nothing can be done agains ppl having a high voice. So lets not discuss it anymore. This ppl are part of the server.

Anything else you want to discuss about the rules?


Regards,
Monster

Offline Ed

Re: Rawr's re-edition of rules (suggestion)
« Reply #85 on: September 15, 2013, 09:22:56 pm »
What is happening with this?
[div class="cat_bar"][div class="catbg" style="font-size: 18px;font-family: Oswald;line-height: 52px;text-shadow: -1px -1px rgba(0, 0, 0, 0.43);    background: #2b2b2b;background: -moz-linear-gradient(top, #2b2b2b 0%, #191919 100%);background: -webkit-linear-gradient(top, #2b2b2b 0%,#191919 100%);background: linear-gradient(to bottom, #2b2b2b 0%,#191919 100%);box-shadow: 0 2px 0 rgba(255,255,255,0.1) inset;text-align:left;font-weight: 700;"][div class="pt_bar"][div class="ptbg"][span class="pt"][email protected][/span][/div][/div]

Offline Fisu

  • The only time success comes before work is in the dictionary.
  • Unstoppable
  • *****
  • Posts: 6973
  • Total likes: 616
  • :)
Re: Rawr's re-edition of rules (suggestion)
« Reply #86 on: September 16, 2013, 08:29:24 am »
I never really understood the rules. After this topic, I even know some rules, which I never really heared about. WTF xD Thanks Rawr.

Offline Ray

  • Just a normal
  • Unstoppable
  • *****
  • Posts: 9604
  • Total likes: 1510
  • Never underestimate the impossible!
Re: Rawr's re-edition of rules (suggestion)
« Reply #87 on: November 09, 2013, 02:01:26 pm »
Bumped


I'm interested in editing rules that will fit with the server.
I decided to make a meeting to discuss these changes.
It will be on TS3, next week, Friday 15/11/2013, From 19:00 GMT+0 Until 21:00 GMT+0
Everyone is invited.
If you spam on TS3 or if you try to corrupt the meeting, you will be kicked from the meeting.
76561198265032072

Offline P o p a y

Re: Rawr's re-edition of rules (suggestion)
« Reply #88 on: November 09, 2013, 02:05:23 pm »
Count me in. I suggest sami<3 to be there as well ( since he and I wrote the previous rules ) we can share experience, opinions and agreements or disagreements for the future edition of them.

Thy,
Popay

Offline 'PL'

Re: Rawr's re-edition of rules (suggestion)
« Reply #89 on: November 09, 2013, 02:06:26 pm »
I COME
I NO SPEAK
I LISTEN
I PROMISE

Offline Rubix

Re: Rawr's re-edition of rules (suggestion)
« Reply #90 on: November 09, 2013, 02:16:26 pm »
Bumped


I'm interested in editing rules that will fit with the server.
I decided to make a meeting to discuss these changes.
It will be on TS3, next week, Friday 15/11/2013, From 19:00 GMT+0 Until 21:00 GMT+0
Everyone is invited.
If you spam on TS3 or if you try to corrupt the meeting, you will be kicked from the meeting.
Guess thats me out then :(
If only TS3 was like this all the time <3




Offline Ray

  • Just a normal
  • Unstoppable
  • *****
  • Posts: 9604
  • Total likes: 1510
  • Never underestimate the impossible!
Re: Rawr's re-edition of rules (suggestion)
« Reply #91 on: November 09, 2013, 02:39:02 pm »
Bumped


I'm interested in editing rules that will fit with the server.
I decided to make a meeting to discuss these changes.
It will be on TS3, next week, Friday 15/11/2013, From 19:00 GMT+0 Until 21:00 GMT+0
Everyone is invited.
If you spam on TS3 or if you try to corrupt the meeting, you will be kicked from the meeting.
Guess thats me out then :(
Aha :D we'll see ^^
76561198265032072

Offline Ed

Re: Rawr's re-edition of rules (suggestion)
« Reply #92 on: November 09, 2013, 06:55:31 pm »
If I cannot attend for any reason what might occur my suggestion in which I strongly believe in is that the old rules should be replaced exactly with these ones. Rawrplus did a fantastic job on this and I have to agree 100%. There might be few bits added and tweaks needed, but in overall these are perfect simple rules for everyone to understand. In these 2-3 years playing I have understood that over complicating rules will lead to many misunderstandings, many unwritten rules to be written so the cycle goes on and on. It's time that JB have decent and polished rule list which should be sustained as it is and most things which could be small and irrelevant to the rules should be dealt in the server by admins on their own approach. After all you have to be able to decide and chose what's right and what's wrong in other words, can't do it, don't be an admin.
[div class="cat_bar"][div class="catbg" style="font-size: 18px;font-family: Oswald;line-height: 52px;text-shadow: -1px -1px rgba(0, 0, 0, 0.43);    background: #2b2b2b;background: -moz-linear-gradient(top, #2b2b2b 0%, #191919 100%);background: -webkit-linear-gradient(top, #2b2b2b 0%,#191919 100%);background: linear-gradient(to bottom, #2b2b2b 0%,#191919 100%);box-shadow: 0 2px 0 rgba(255,255,255,0.1) inset;text-align:left;font-weight: 700;"][div class="pt_bar"][div class="ptbg"][span class="pt"][email protected][/span][/div][/div]

Offline ~RoN

Re: Rawr's re-edition of rules (suggestion)
« Reply #93 on: November 09, 2013, 10:13:47 pm »
count me in too will be there.  8)
Once you cross over, there are things
in the darkness that can keep your heart
from ever feeling the light again.

Offline DonJowy

Re: Rawr's re-edition of rules (suggestion)
« Reply #94 on: November 11, 2013, 06:30:30 pm »
I COME
I NO SPEAK
I LISTEN
I PROMISE
I UNDERSTOOD A WORD !
Count me in (please somebody remind me because i forget so damn much :'( )


Kellys :(

Offline EL1TE

  • never trouble , trouble till trouble , troubles you , you'll only double trouble and trouble others too !!
  • Sr Member
  • **
  • Posts: 249
  • Total likes: 0
  • Love EL1TE , love JB !
Re: Rawr's re-edition of rules (suggestion)
« Reply #95 on: November 12, 2013, 01:58:18 pm »
Like it aswell , nice rules !!  ;D

Offline Ray

  • Just a normal
  • Unstoppable
  • *****
  • Posts: 9604
  • Total likes: 1510
  • Never underestimate the impossible!
Re: Rawr's re-edition of rules (suggestion)
« Reply #96 on: November 15, 2013, 06:09:42 pm »
Bump, meeting in 50 mins
76561198265032072

Offline terraboN

Re: Rawr's re-edition of rules (suggestion)
« Reply #97 on: November 15, 2013, 06:10:35 pm »
Can i come? Been some time since i have been in the JB side of things.

Offline Lagger

  • VIP
  • ***
  • Posts: 2682
  • Total likes: 357
Re: Rawr's re-edition of rules (suggestion)
« Reply #98 on: November 15, 2013, 06:28:50 pm »
Would like to come and hear what you guys have to say, even thought my mic is broken so I won't talk :p

Offline M-16(THE_BEST)

Re: Rawr's re-edition of rules (suggestion)
« Reply #99 on: November 15, 2013, 06:34:16 pm »
comming also :D