To be honest, i do not agree with anyone who've posted on this topic, yet on the other hand i would agree with every unto a certain level.
Yea Terrabon, there are quite some players who dislike ss2dm including you, and for example Rubix and me. Yet in the meanwhile i have to admit that the map brings activity to the server which is why we have it after all, yet not much more activity than the other version of ss2dm did.
So yes Shark, it does bring activity. But don't be mistaken, so do our classic maps. As you can see here:

Ss2 classic is still the most voted map. By going full dm we would lose a lot of players like Terrabon, as you can see he wouldn't enjoy ss2dm 24/7.
Personally, i suggest everyone to have a two-sided look on the server rather than a one-sided look and at the same time don't think what you want, yet what the players want.
As for ss2dm camperzones, i would indeed recommend them. As of this moment it is possible to stand on t1 with 2/3 players and kill everyone jumping from spawn which makes it impossible for the player to kill the others, even though he might be pro he just won't be able to escape those campers.
Also, if you take a look at our rank. You can see that surf does fine compared to other ambrosia servers. And the fact that even though our last boost was a month ago, the server manached to attach the players so they would stay on surf as we are higher ranked than for example public which has been boosted a week ago. Means surf isn't a bad server at this moment. Don't mistaken me though, this does not mean we can not improve. Yet going full dm wouldn't be an improvement if you would ask me, neither would full classic. It's the mixture that does it.
Yes i do have to agree that we're decading in rank, due to my inactivity and me being unable to boost, it all comes down to Rubix who does his best trying to get a boost up and getting the server running smoothly.
Sincerely, Pim