this is the site that i downloaded my cs 1.6It has nothing to do with your config, the plugin is set to take a screenshot whatever that option is enabled or not.
http://en.osdn.jp/projects/sfnet_tfs21/downloads/Counter%20Strike%201.6%20install/Counter%20Strike%201.6%20Final.exe/ (http://en.osdn.jp/projects/sfnet_tfs21/downloads/Counter%20Strike%201.6%20install/Counter%20Strike%201.6%20Final.exe/)
http://osdn.jp/projects/sfnet_tfs21/downloads/Counter%20Strike%201.6%20install/Counter%20Strike%201.6%20Maps.exe/ (http://osdn.jp/projects/sfnet_tfs21/downloads/Counter%20Strike%201.6%20install/Counter%20Strike%201.6%20Maps.exe/)
i've windows7 and i have not any screenshots of any match.
u can install it and check it by urself.
here's another thing, take a look to this:
http://oi59.tinypic.com/izyknk.jpg (http://oi59.tinypic.com/izyknk.jpg)
this is my cs default configuration. when i check it, it will unchecked when i quit the game automatically.
2. Explain wtf is this http://www.filedropper.com/macbook (http://www.filedropper.com/macbook) as i guess it's irrelevant
It has nothing to do with your config, the plugin is set to take a screenshot whatever that option is enabled or not.
There are certain modified versions of cs 1.6 which prevent external sources from executing commands on a clients console. I have a similar version of cs 1.6 so yea when admin's abuse on me , with m_yaw "bullshit" it doesn't work.What you are saying is true, but it works for SNAPSHOT command.
I kinda doubt it cause i have been banned over a hundred if not more times ? yet i have 0 screenshots in my cs folder.There are certain modified versions of cs 1.6 which prevent external sources from executing commands on a clients console. I have a similar version of cs 1.6 so yea when admin's abuse on me , with m_yaw "bullshit" it doesn't work.What you are saying is true, but it works for SNAPSHOT command.
snapshot command is not a configuration command therefore those cs versions do not block it.I kinda doubt it cause i have been banned over a hundred if not more times ? yet i have 0 screenshots in my cs folder.There are certain modified versions of cs 1.6 which prevent external sources from executing commands on a clients console. I have a similar version of cs 1.6 so yea when admin's abuse on me , with m_yaw "bullshit" it doesn't work.What you are saying is true, but it works for SNAPSHOT command.
Most Windows OS protect Program Files with administrator rights. And usually, if cs is installed in C Program Files, everything written by hl.exe is set hidden.I kinda doubt it cause i have been banned over a hundred if not more times ? yet i have 0 screenshots in my cs folder.There are certain modified versions of cs 1.6 which prevent external sources from executing commands on a clients console. I have a similar version of cs 1.6 so yea when admin's abuse on me , with m_yaw "bullshit" it doesn't work.What you are saying is true, but it works for SNAPSHOT command.
and the solution?Wait for unban panel decision they'll decide about your case, good luck with it.
for the last time. i told u *I'M NOT A WALL^HACKER* and that's the bottom line.
it's not fair to ban macbook because he don't have a SS, look for example at this unban request:-
http://www.ambrosia-servers.eu/community/index.php?topic=33000.20 (http://www.ambrosia-servers.eu/community/index.php?topic=33000.20)
in this request, I demanded from the banned person to provide the SS cuz he tried to hide it.
but RuBix said that the SS has been not taken on thier clients, but NO, the SS actually has been taken on their clients, and I can prove that.
and finally they got unbanned without providing SS. just because Rubix was a friend with him maybe!.
I actually wanted to Report Rubix for this action but I didn't got enough time for that.
and yeah those 2 people who got unbanned without providing SS are not better than macbook.
it's not fair to ban macbook because he don't have a SS, look for example at this unban request:-
http://www.ambrosia-servers.eu/community/index.php?topic=33000.20 (http://www.ambrosia-servers.eu/community/index.php?topic=33000.20)
in this request, I demanded from the banned person to provide the SS cuz he tried to hide it.
but RuBix said that the SS has been not taken on thier clients, but NO, the SS actually has been taken on their clients, and I can prove that.
and finally they got unbanned without providing SS. just because Rubix was a friend with him maybe!.
I actually wanted to Report Rubix for this action but I didn't got enough time for that.
and yeah those 2 people who got unbanned without providing SS are not better than macbook.
would be interesting to get some proof..
stop giving negative comments everywhere
<STEAM_0:0:1882847705><109> Peeons [38 @ huge gamer : -[ test hook v0.1 ]-.
<STEAM_0:1:1723216><81> Peenos [38 @ huge gamer : Huh?
Her IP begins with 81, the cheaters starts with 109.
Clear mistaken identity imo, would advise an unban soon but im in a hurry
From Ray: It's a basic command that every cs has.You got a point there Ray . I have encountered about five or six versions of cs on this hl engine and can affirm what Ray said.
it's not fair to ban macbook because he don't have a SS, look for example at this unban request:-
http://www.ambrosia-servers.eu/community/index.php?topic=33000.20 (http://www.ambrosia-servers.eu/community/index.php?topic=33000.20)
in this request, I demanded from the banned person to provide the SS cuz he tried to hide it.
but RuBix said that the SS has been not taken on thier clients, but NO, the SS actually has been taken on their clients, and I can prove that.
if I report Rubix nobudy will care, and he probably will be judged as clean, just because he is a known high staff and his friends will defend him even if he is gulity.
see high staff report section:- http://www.ambrosia-servers.eu/community/index.php?board=26.0 (http://www.ambrosia-servers.eu/community/index.php?board=26.0)
I've reported Buckk before ages still no action taken.
and finally they got unbanned without providing SS. just because Rubix was a friend with him maybe!.
I actually wanted to Report Rubix for this action but I didn't got enough time for that.
and yeah those 2 people who got unbanned without providing SS are not better than macbook.
would be interesting to get some proof..
stop giving negative comments everywhere
-As grmbl pointed out, if you want to continue it make a report and let's see it there
btw your screenshots are not opening for me
2 people got unbanned without screenshot because it wasn't them in the demo. This is him in the demo.it's not fair to ban macbook because he don't have a SS, look for example at this unban request:-
http://www.ambrosia-servers.eu/community/index.php?topic=33000.20 (http://www.ambrosia-servers.eu/community/index.php?topic=33000.20)
in this request, I demanded from the banned person to provide the SS cuz he tried to hide it.
but RuBix said that the SS has been not taken on thier clients, but NO, the SS actually has been taken on their clients, and I can prove that.
if I report Rubix nobudy will care, and he probably will be judged as clean, just because he is a known high staff and his friends will defend him even if he is gulity.
see high staff report section:- http://www.ambrosia-servers.eu/community/index.php?board=26.0 (http://www.ambrosia-servers.eu/community/index.php?board=26.0)
I've reported Buckk before ages still no action taken.
and finally they got unbanned without providing SS. just because Rubix was a friend with him maybe!.
I actually wanted to Report Rubix for this action but I didn't got enough time for that.
and yeah those 2 people who got unbanned without providing SS are not better than macbook.
would be interesting to get some proof..
stop giving negative comments everywhere
-As grmbl pointed out, if you want to continue it make a report and let's see it there
btw your screenshots are not opening for me
if i make a report, nobuddy will care(they don't care about the servers itself, how they will care about a report?), also i got no-enough time.
I've reported "Buckk" ages ago, nobuddy took an action till now.
and @Ray how am talking non-sense?, two people got unbanned without providing SS, and here in this case, macbook is not unbanned cuz of SS.
so you better keep quiet, it's 100% on-topic.